Commonwealth v. Unangst
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
Raymond G. Unangst maintains that the trial court improperly denied his written presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. We conclude that Appellant, who unequivocally claimed that he was innocent of the offenses in his motion, presented a fair and just reason to withdraw his guilty plea. Given that the Commonwealth has made no assertion that withdrawal would prejudice it, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand with instructions, that the trial court permit Appellant to withdraw the guilty plea entered in these two cases.
The present appeal concerns two lower…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ForbesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RandolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. FlickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. PardoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. TennisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Carrasquillo, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CarrasquilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. Armour, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Com. v. Bickham, T., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Bramhall, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.