Legal Opinion
Venture Industries Corp. v. Autoliv ASP, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 7, 2006No. 2005-1537PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Autoliv ASP, Inc. (“Autoliv”) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan denying Autoliv’s motion for relief from judgment in favor of Venture Industries Corp., Vemco, Inc., Patent Holding Co., and Larry J. Winget (collectively “Venture”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, sections (b)(2) and (b)(3). Venture Indus. Corp. v. Autoliv ASP, Inc., No. 99-75354 (E.D.Mich. July 15, 2005) (Judge Avern Cohn). 1 We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Autoliv’s request under Rule 60(b)(2), but that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Derrick E. Harper v. Autoalliance International, Inc., Aai Employee Services Co., L.L.C., Jeffrey Kelly, and Allen ChildressCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mallory v. EyrichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Edith Stridiron v. Andre StridironCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Williams v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. v. Life360, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Computer Leasco, Inc. v. NTP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Madison Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Wagstaff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.