Young v. Chao
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHERYL YOUNG, Case No. 19-cv-01411-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 PETE BUTTIGIEG, Re: Dkt. No. 69 Defendant. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Cheryl Young, pro se, seeks de novo review of discrimination and retaliation 14 claims where she prevailed on the merits in administrative proceedings but was dissatisfied with 15 position offered for reinstatement, which the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 16 (“EEOC”) ultimately held, over Young’s objection, to be equivalent to her…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Miles v. Apex Marine Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.