Legal Opinion

Bondurant v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 17, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · WellesDavid H. Welles, J.

in which JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS and ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, JJ., joined.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of post-conviction petitions due to a finding of unfavorable DNA analysis results. The Petitioners, Hugh Peter Bondurant and Kenneth Patterson Bondurant, challenge the trial court’s dismissal of their petitions for DNA testing and analysis filed pursuant to the Post-Conviction DNA Analysis Act of 2001. After ordering DNA testing, the trial court found the results of the DNA analysis were not favorable to the Petitioners and dismissed both of their petitions for post-conviction…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Serrano v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Browder v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. OwensTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dexter Travon Carpenter v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2022
  2. Sean Patrick Goble v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  3. Willie L. Pegues v. State of TennesseeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API