Legal Opinion

Fahnestock v. Clark Henry Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.

Defendant Joseph W. Dixon is a member of defendant Graham, Parsons & Co., domestic bankers. Greenebaum Sons Securities Corporation is a domestic corporation. These defendants-separately move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

The defendants Clark Henry Corporation, Bing & Bing, Inc., Udell Realty Co., Inc., and Irex Realty Corporation, are domestic corporations. Fidel Corporation is a Delaware corporation. The defendants Leo S. Bing, William Guthman, Bertha H. Schwartz, Martin Samuels and Max Sloman are officers and directors of Bing & Bing, Inc. These defendants…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Sullivan v. . RossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Cohalan v. New York World-Telegram Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Michelsen v. PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API