Legal Opinion

Walden v. Pryor

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 10, 2022No. 5:18-cv-00171Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-CV-171-TBR BENJAMIN WALDEN, PLAINTIFF v. LYNN PRYOR, et al., DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Lynn Pryor’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Larry Rogers (“Motion in Limine”), [DN 59], and Motion for Summary Judgment, [DN 58]. Plaintiff Benjamin Walden filed responses to both motions, [DN 67; DN 68], and Defendant replied, [DN 71; DN 72]. These motions are therefore fully briefed and ripe for review. For the reasons set forth herein,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API