Legal Opinion

Zohrab & Naomi Tazian v. Alice Cline

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1998No. 02S03-9709-CV-512Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorneys for Appellant

Catherine S. Christoff

Christoff & Christoff

Fort Wayne, Indiana

Attorneys for Amici Curiae, Indiana Farm Bureau and “Landowner Class Members”

Nels Ackerson

The Ackerson Group, Chartered

Washington D.C.

Henry J. Price

Price & Findling

Indianapolis, IN

Attorneys for Appellee

Dennis D. Sutton

Burt, Blee, Dixon & Sutton

Fort Wayne, Indiana

IN THE

INDIANA SUPREME COURT

IN RE: ZOHRAB K. TAZIAN and

NAOMI TAZIAN,

Appellants (Defendants below),

and JAMES A. LONG, II and

MARY ANN LONG, ROBERT S.

WARNER AND MALEA A. RAMER,

and ELEANOR L. DOEHLA,

Defendants (not participating

in this appeal)

v.

ALICE CLINE,

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. New York Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Brown v. Penn Central Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Enderle v. SharmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API