Legal Opinion
Calcagno v. Kipling Apparel Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 1, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02247Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTINA CALCAGNO, Case No. 23-cv-2247-BAS-BLM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 KIPLING APPAREL CORP., et al., (ECF No. 10) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant Kipling Apparel Corporation’s (“Kipling”) 19 motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff 20 Christina Calcagno’s Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 10.) The Court finds Defendant’s 21 motion suitable for determination on the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.