Legal Opinion
Ted Breezy v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided August 12, 2004No. 01-03-00985-CV, 01-03-00986-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.
We consider these two interlocutory, accelerated appeals together because they present identical governmental immunity issues regarding the alleged mishandling of willed bodies and remains. 1 Appellants, Joe Noah and Susan Newman (“the Noah plaintiffs”) and Ted Breezy, individually and as representative of the estate of Elizabeth Ann Breezy, Joan Breezy Speer, Kathleen Hagan, Victoria Quinn, Paul Hargrave, individually and as representative of the estate of Michael Hargrave, Leanna Lankford, individually and as representative of the estate of Bonnie Stanford…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. DeLanneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. WhitleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Kai Hui Qi, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Robinson v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Tim Kennedy, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Edna Mae Kennedy v. Anatomical Board of the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
- Noah v. UNIV. OF TX MED. BRAH. AT GALVESTON, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.