Legal Opinion
Coliniatis v. Dimas
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1994No. 92 Civ. 8372 (SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
This action for libel, tortious interference with employment and intentional infliction of emotional distress arises out of a letter written by a law firm to its client containing allegations that plaintiff Nicholas Coliniatis (“Coliniatis”) was involved in an illegal kickback scheme. Presently before the Court is a motion by defendants Simos C. Dimas (“Di-mas”) and Dimas & Johnston (collectively, the “Dimas Defendants”) to dismiss the First, Third and Fourth Causes of Action, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), for failure to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Netzer v. Continuity Graphic Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Neufeld v. NeufeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Jewell v. NYP Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Restis v. American Coalition Against Nuclear Iran, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- H & R INDUSTRIES, INC. v. KirshnerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.