Henratty v. Zerbst
United States District Court for the District of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcDERMOTT, Circuit Judge
(Assigned) .
The .respondent has filed a motion to dismiss an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that the amended petition does not state facts sufficient to entitle the petitioner to the writ. The facts alleged may be summarized as follows:
The petitioner was sentenced on December 20, 1924, to serve five years’ imprisoqment on each of two convictions, the sentences to run consecutively. Petitioner began serv*231iug Ms sentence on December 28, 1924, and an April 24, 1930, he was paroled by the proper authorities. The parole order contained the usual conditions and also the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Woodward v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Platek v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- In re ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Morgan v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Christianson v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- United States Ex Rel. Gutterson v. ThompsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Welch v. HillisDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1944
- Klinkner v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.