Despres v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.
*574 Following a grant of certification to appeal by the habeas court, the petitioner, Mark Despres, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) "used an erroneous standard and analysis" in *575 rejecting his claim that the ineffective assistance of his counsel at sentencing deprived him of his right to appeal from the judgment of conviction on his guilty pleas, and (2) "used an erroneous analysis" in rejecting his claim that the judge who presided over his first habeas trial should…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CanalesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- D'Amico v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Taylor v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Kalama Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Despres v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Despres v. Commissioner of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021