Legal Opinion

Milligan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 2010No. A10A1343PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Presiding Judge.

After a jury trial, Dana Jerry Milligan was convicted of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute and misdemeanor obstruction of a law enforcement officer. On appeal, he contends that the court erred in admitting certain evidence, in excluding him from a charge conference, in referring to “admissions” in a jury charge, and in the manner in which it responded to announcements from the jury that it could not reach a verdict on possession with intent to distribute. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

1. Milligan argues that the court erred in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Sears v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Contreras v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Suntrust Bank v. BickerstaffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. MORMAN-JOHNSON v. HathawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Aundray Barnes v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024
  5. State v. Nicholas A. DeanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API