Legal Opinion

MORMAN-JOHNSON v. Hathaway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 28, 2011No. A11A1188PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Judge.

Appearing pro se, Angela Morman-Johnson appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Gary Hathaway and Summit Surgical Specialists on her claims for medical negligence and medical battery stemming from Hathaway’s removal of Morman-Johnson’s abdominal mass. She asserts several errors on appeal, most with regard to the court’s instructions to the jury. We conclude that these claims are without merit and affirm.

We first note that Morman-Johnson’s brief on appeal fails to comply with the rules of this court. See Court of Appeals Rule 25. Morman-Johnson…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salazar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Chung v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Kent v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Milligan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Georgia Communications Corp. v. HorneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hutto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Mordica v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Hudgins v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. In Re: Estate of Randolph Benedict CurvanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
  5. Jeffery Mordica v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API