Soltysiak v. Unum Provident Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.
In this action governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., this Court previously reversed Defendant UNUM Provident Corporation’s denial of disability benefits to Plaintiff Douglas R. Soltysiak and ordered Defendant to conduct a full and fair review of Plaintiffs disability claim. (Docket # 24). This matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for costs and attorney fees. Defendant opposes the motion based upon its contentions that it is untimely, Plaintiff was not a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colby v. Assurant Employee BenefitsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Poly-Flex Construction, Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Huizinga v. Genzink Steel Supply & Welding Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
- Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2010
- McKay v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.