Legal Opinion

Jones v. Whirlpool Corporation

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 27, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02425Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Edith Jones, pro se, Case No. 3:18-cv-2425 Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Whirlpool Corporation, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Whirlpool Corporation moves to dismiss the complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Edith Jones for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 22). Jones filed a brief in opposition, (Doc. No. 24), and Whirlpool filed a brief in reply. (Doc. No. 26). Jones filed a motion to amend her brief in opposition due to a typographical error. (Doc.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API