Legal Opinion

California Diversified Promotions, Inc. v. James A. Musick

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1974No. 73-1554PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, * District Judge.

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Appellants appeal the dismissal of their claim for injunctive relief and damages, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1343, and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1970). Appellants are a California corporation doing business as the Frontier Room and its employee dancers. They allege that the defendants-appel-lees, Sheriff of the County of Orange, California, and four of his deputies, engaged in an “intentional program of harassment and bad-faith law enforcement” to chill their right to present…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Morcos S. Azer Doctor's Medical Laboratory, Inc. v. Kathleen Connell John Chen Steven Fujimori Joseph P. Munso Al SchadenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Rk Ventures, Inc. v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. RK Ventures, Inc. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Alred Lewis v. The State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API