Legal Opinion
Sproles v. Binford
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 30, 1931No. 476PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNERLY, District Judge.
Alleging that the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, and that it arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States, complainant, Ed Sproles, a common carrier, engaged, under the name of S'proles Motor Freight Lines, in transporting commodities in motor vehicles over the highways of Texas, sues herein James V. Allred, Attorney General of Texas, and numerous other law enforcement officers of the state, including T. Binford, sheriff of Harris county, and a resident citizen of this judicial district, to enjoin the enforcement, as to him,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex-Cell-O Corporation v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Stephenson v. BinfordDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1931
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1931
- Sage v. BaldwinDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1932
- Contract Cartage Co. v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.