Legal Opinion
IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF CONRADY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 2017No. SCBD 6413PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
¶ 1 This proceeding was brought for the purpose of reinstating a lawyer’s suspended license to practice law. We conclude the evidence is sufficient to support reinstatement.
¶ 2 Petitioner’s license to practice law was suspended for two years and one day by this Court in April 2012. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass’n v. Conrady, 2012 OK 29, 275 P.3d 133. Conrady violated the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (O.R.P.C.), Rule 8.4, 1 and the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (R.G.D.P.), Rule 1.3. 2 Petitioner’s professional discipline arose from six criminal acts he committed while in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Matter of Reinstatement of CantrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SamaraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- In Re the Reinstatement of PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF ARNETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF TAYLORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF MORGANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel OBA v. CONRADYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
- IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF MORGANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.