Canterbury v. State

BERREY, Judge.

Appeal from the denial, after evidentiary hearing, of appellant’s Rule 27.26 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Appellant presents two points on appeal: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to enter specific and more complete findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) that the motion court erred in denying appellant’s Rule 27.-26 motion in that defense counsel failed to present testimony of a witness establishing a defense of intoxication or drugged condition. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of capital murder and was…