Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. NDOC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 23, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01562Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN, Case No. 2:18-cv-01562-GMN-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 NDOC, et al., Re: ECF No. 10 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff Michael T. McLaughlin’s unopposed “Motion to Amend Civil 11 Action” (ECF No. 10), which is construed as a motion for leave to amend his operative original 12 Complaint (ECF No. 5) filed on October 18, 2019. The Court finds as follows. 13 I. CASE BACKGROUND 14 The facts in Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint (the “PAC”) largely mirror those 15…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API