Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. Salkind

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFbaNk, J.

Tbe defendant appeals from a judgment awarded to tbe plaintiff after a nonjury trial. Tbe action was predicated upon an oral agreement alleged to bave been made on or about April 1, 1955, for tbe sale by tbe plaintiff to tbe defendant of 50 shares of common stock in a corporation in wbicb botb parties together witb one Scbeiner held equal stock interests.

Since it is conceded that tbe contract upon wbicb tbe action was predicated is oral, and is for tbe sale of goods valued in excess of tbe sum of $50, it would, without more, be violative of tbe Statute of Frauds (Personal Property Law, § 85).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Schwartz v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Young v. . IngalsbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Viacom International Inc. v. Tandem Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Jim Bouton Corp. v. Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Lizza & Sons, Inc. v. D'OnfroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  4. Jim Bouton Corporation v. Wm. Wrigley Jr. CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API