Legal Opinion

Rose v. Tandowsky

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1947No. Civ. 15667, 15779PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment decreeing him to be the father of the minor child of plaintiff and ordering him to pay $100 per month for the child’s support. Defendant also has appealed from an order allowing plaintiff additional counsel fees upon the appeal. The two appeals have been consolidated and presented upon a single set of briefs.

The action was commenced in November, 1945, to establish paternity of a child born May 21, 1940. Plaintiff testified that she first met the defendant, a physician practicing in Hollywood, in 1934; that in the year 1936, she commenced having…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Andrade v. NewhouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Pessin Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. In Re SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Mish v. BrockusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Lebkicher v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API