Legal Opinion

Succession of Desina

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 21, 1907No. 16,458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In the matter of the succession of Carmelite Desina, wife of F. R. Kurucar. F. R. Kurucar, on commitment for contempt, applies for certiorari, prohibition, and habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

The petitioner alleges that the succession of the decedent, his wife, having been opened, he was called upon by the *279notary making the inventory to point out its property, and that he pointed out such property as, in his opinion, belongs to the succession ; that, thereupon, the attorney of, the heirs proceeded against him, by rule, alleging that he had, in May, 1906, received, as the paraphernal property of the decedent, and for purposes of administration, sums exceeding $85,000, the whereabouts of vidiKh he refused to disclose, and praying that he be- ordered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Succession of MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  3. Succession of Mrs. CarcagnoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  4. Succession of MielkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1853
  5. Lavigne's Heirs v. ChalambertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Successions of KerlecSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API