Legal Opinion

Stratton v. Cartmell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1945PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.

This is a suit to recover a commission upon the sale of a locker plant. From the facts found it appears that at all times material the plaintiff was the branch manager of defendant’s store in Rutland. In March, 1941, the plaintiff received a letter, Exhibit 1, from the defendant addressed to him and signed by the defendant, the body of which reads as follows:

“Confirming our agreement in regard to the basis on which our branch managers are to work from March 1st, 1941, on is as follows:
“Manager is to be paid on a commission of 12% on all his personal sales, together with a 2% override on all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  2. Manchester Marble Co. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  3. Campbell v. RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Heli-Coil Corporation v. Reginald WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  4. Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  5. Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API