Legal Opinion
Stratton v. Cartmell
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 1, 1945PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is a suit to recover a commission upon the sale of a locker plant. From the facts found it appears that at all times material the plaintiff was the branch manager of defendant’s store in Rutland. In March, 1941, the plaintiff received a letter, Exhibit 1, from the defendant addressed to him and signed by the defendant, the body of which reads as follows:
“Confirming our agreement in regard to the basis on which our branch managers are to work from March 1st, 1941, on is as follows:
“Manager is to be paid on a commission of 12% on all his personal sales, together with a 2% override on all…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cook v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Manchester Marble Co. v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Campbell v. RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
3Cited by20 opinions
- Heli-Coil Corporation v. Reginald WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- H. P. Hood & Sons v. HeinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Holton Estate v. EllisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
- Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.