Legal Opinion

W.O. And Eliza Narramore v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 7, 1992No. 91-1204PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

From 1959 to 1960, the United States condemned 5,398 acres of the Narramores’ property to obtain flowage easements for the Painted Rock Reservoir. In a 1980 action against the United States, the Nar-ramores alleged that the Corps of Engineers had inundated their land beyond the scope of the easements. The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted the Narramores’ motion to reopen the 1960 condemnation judgment. Narramore v. United States, No. 80-916-PHX-RGS (D.Ariz. Oct. 2, 1990). Because the district court lacks jurisdiction, this court vacates that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Don Applegate and Gayle Applegate (For Themselves and a Class of Others Similarly Situated, Totalling 271) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Cortez v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
  3. Reed Island-MLC, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Pettro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Beres v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API