Legal Opinion

America Fonseca-Sanchez v. Alberto R. Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 2007No. 06-2387PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) branch of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) issued a Final Administrative Removal Order (“FARO”) to America Fonseca-Sanchez, directing her removal from the United States. Fonseca-Sanchez then petitioned the Citizenship and Immigration Service (“CIS”) for interim relief under the “U” visa statute to avoid removal. Because DHS had not (and still has not) issued final “U” visa regulations to determine eligibility, CIS relied upon criteria contained in what it calls “guidance memoranda” issued by DHS. Based on those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Rene Carvajal-Munoz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Srivenugopala Gattem v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Massis v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Torres-Tristan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Biuma Claudine Malu v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Muratoski v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Eddy Etienne v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API