Legal Opinion
Biuma Claudine Malu v. U.S. Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 19, 2014No. 13-10409PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This petition for review presents an issue about exhaustion of remedies that has divided our sister circuits: whether an alien must contest her status as an aggravated felon in an expedited removal proceeding before raising that argument before a federal court of appeals. Biuma Malu argues that she should not have been subject to expedited removal proceedings because she did not commit an “aggravated felony,” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Malu also contests the denial of her application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. She contends…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Sergio Leonel Mendoze v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Andres Amaya-Artunduaga v. U.S. Atty. Gen.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Herb v. PitcairnSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Yasmick Jeune v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Antonio A. Gonzalez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Maria Belen Perez-Zenteno v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Nelson Quinteros v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Eddy Etienne v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.