Legal Opinion

Decker v. Decker, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 17, 1998No. CV-96-424-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Decker v. Decker, et al. CV-96-424-M 02/17/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Marshall N. Decker v. Civil No. 96-424-M David R. Decker; Duncan Farmer; Robert Stinson; Normandin, Cheney & O'Neil, P.A.; Decker, Fitzgerald & Sessler, P.A.; a/k/a Fitzgerald & Sessler, P.A. O R D E R Pro se plaintiff, Marshall Decker, filed the present action against his brother, David Decker, and other defendants, following state court litigation arising out of a failed business relationship between Marshall and David. Marshall asserts claims for abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API