Legal Opinion

United States v. Levasseur

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided October 7, 1985No. 85 Crim 143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GLASSER, District Judge:

The defendants have moved this Court pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of the Fed.R. Crim.P. for an order suppressing physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. The defendants contend that the af fidavit of an F.B.I. Agent based upon which the search warrant was granted contained statements which were knowingly and intentionally false or made by him with a reckless disregard for the truth and that a hearing to test their contentions is required by Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). The defendants also contend…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond Levasseur, Carol Ann Manning, Thomas William Manning, Barbara Curzi-Laaman, Richard Charles Williams, Jaan Karl LaamanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Jaan Karl Laaman, Richard C. Williams Barbara Jean Curzi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. International Islamic Community of Masjid Baytulkhaliq, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
  4. United States v. LevasseurDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  5. Curzi v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API