Legal Opinion
Jaan Karl Laaman, Richard C. Williams Barbara Jean Curzi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 19, 1992No. 1412, 1254 and 1291, Dockets 91-2547, 91-2558 and 91-2581PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Jaan Karl Laaman, petitioner-appellant Richard C. Williams, and petitioner-appellant Barbara Jean Curzi (collectively “petitioners”) appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, I. Leo Glasser, Judge, entered September 17, 1991 that denied their petitions to vacate or set aside their sentences pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). See Curzi v. United States, 773 F.Supp. 535 (E.D.N.Y.1991) (memorandum and order of the district court).
Petitioners, along with three codefend-ants, had been convicted of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Lewis Aaron CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Stochastic Decisions, Inc. v. DiDomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Anthony Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Carson v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.