Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 21, 2006No. 06PDJ028Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER RE: REINSTATEMENT PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P. 251.29

I. ISSUE

An attorney seeking reinstatement under C.R.C.P. 251.29 must prove compliance with all disciplinary orders, fitness to practice, and rehabilitation by clear and convincing evidence. The People stipulated that Petitioner complied with all applicable disciplinary orders and that he is professionally competent. Petitioner provided substantial evidence of a meaningful and sustained change in his character since the time of his original suspension. Should the Hearing Board reinstate Petitioner’s license to practice law?

DECISION…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KleinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. In Re CardwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Goff v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Lockley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API