Legal Opinion
Mittet v. Home Insurance
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1926No. File No. 5668PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORIARTY, C.
This action was brought by the respondents for the recovery of the value of a car lost by theft, and upon which appellant had issued a policy of automobile theft insurance.
There is practically no dispute as to the facts, which are as follows:
On May 12, 1921, the appellant issued a policy of automobile theft insurance in the sum of $1,500 upon a certain automobile owned by respondent Andrew Mittet. The respondent George A. Morse, Inc., had an interest in the property insured by reason of a balance due it upon the purchase price. The insurance policy sued upon contained the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liverpool & London Insurance v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Norwaysz v. Thuringia InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Schuermann v. Dwelling House InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Sumter Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- McClure v. Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Stanley v. American Motorist InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Denley v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. SelfCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- McDaniel v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.