Schmidt v. Ludwig
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.
Action on three promissory notes. The answer, as amended, sets out — not, perhaps, in the best manner in which such, a defence might be stated, but sufficiently to enable the court and opposite party to kn»w what facts were relied on for defence — in substance these facts: The notes in suit, with others, all amounting to five thousand dollars, were executed by defendant to Christian Schmidt, as the *86consideration for real estate conveyed by Schmidt to defendant, and defendant executed to Schmidt a mortgage on the real estate, to secure the notes. Schmidt assigned the notes and mortgage to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kellogg v. RichardsNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Landrum v. Trowbridge, Dwight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Boyd v. HitchcockNew York Supreme Court · 1822
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Mason v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Bacich v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Gage v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Bennett v. HillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1884