Legal Opinion

Thacker v. Klotz

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 8, 1940No. Record No. 2203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The defendant, Alexander H. Klotz, of Fredericksburg, dismantles cars and sells their parts for what they will bring. The plaintiff, Robert H. Thacker, worked for him, and on November 12, 1937, while undertaking to detach a rear wheel from a Model A Ford, was struck by a splinter of steel and blinded in his left eye. In compensation he obtained a verdict of $1,000. That the trial court set aside and entered final judgment for the defendant.

Thacker had worked with Klotz for about three years. He had been a farm laborer; he had driven an automobile; he had worked in a nursery; he had dug…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Sparrow's Admr.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Colonna Shipyard, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  3. Meyer v. LadewigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sheltrown v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MizelleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bly v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  2. Adams v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of NassanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API