Legal Opinion
State, Department of Military & Veterans Affairs v. Bowen
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1998No. S-6842, S-6822PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice Pro Tem.
I. INTRODUCTION
Gary Bowen, who had served for nine years in the active state service of the state organized militia, was involuntarily terminated from his employment in May 1993. He appealed his termination to the superior court, arguing principally that the State Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Alaska National Guard (State) had failed to follow the provisions of the Alaska Personnel Act and had deprived him of due process of law in the procedures that.it employed in terminating his employment. The State contended that Bowen was a federal…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bowen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Holmes v. California National GuardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Estate of Himsel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Kise v. Department of MilitarySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kise v. Department of Military & Veterans AffairsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.