Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Davenport v. M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 28, 1993No. C-920142Published

1Concurring in the judgmentM.B. Bettman, Judge

Appellant invites us in the instant case to apply Cremeans v. Willmar Henderson Mfg. Co. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 145, 566 N.E.2d 1203, a products liability case, to workplace injuries under the safe-workplace statute. I believe that such an extension of the law is consistent with the philosophy of the court expressed in Cremeans.

The syllabus of Cremeans, in which a majority of the court concurred, is by no means limited to products liability cases. It holds that:

“An employee does not voluntarily or unreasonably assume the risk of injury which occurs in the course of his or her employment when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cremeans v. Willmar Henderson Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Westwood v. Thrifty Boy Super Markets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Syler v. Signode Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API