Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Zapf

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1985No. 84-1971-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

The referee recommended that Attorney Robert Zapf be publicly reprimanded for unprofessional conduct in connection with two matters in which he participated as district attorney for Kenosha county. The referee also recommended that Attorney Zapf be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. We agree that a public reprimand is appropriate discipline and that Attorney Zapf be required to pay the costs of the proceeding.

Attorney Zapf was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1974, and he has not been the subject of a prior…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nelson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. CopeningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. RuizWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Unnamed v. ConnorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against KohlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Zapf (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Robert Zapf)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API