Legal Opinion

American Bonding & Trust Co. v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 16, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Dennis, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The appellee sued the appellant on a surety bond for losses sustained by the former through Upton S. Brumbaugh in connection with the duties of his position as its general agent. There are two counts in the declaration, but they are similar, excepting as to the dates, the appellant having renewed for a year a bond which it had given for the previous year to “ make good and reimburse to " the appellee to the extent of two thousand dollars, such pecuniary loss as it may sustain “ by reason of any fraudulent or dishonest acts of the employed in connection with the duties of said position,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stone v. SeymourCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  2. County of Pine v. WillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. State v. BaumhagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Rogers v. State ex rel. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Buchanan County v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Iowa Lillooet Gold Min. Co. v. BlissU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1906
  2. Canton National Bank v. American Bonding & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Vitrified Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Union Central Life Ins. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. State v. BogardusWashington Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API