Wachter v. Grogan
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
Plaintiff Anthony J. Wachter claimed that the defendant Union had maliciously expelled him. He sued the Union for actual and punitive damages, and the jury gave him a $12,700 verdict. On the Union’s after-trial motion for judgment the trial court decided it did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter and entered judgment for the Union. Wachter appeals.
Here, the decisive issue is whether Wach-ter’s claim comes within the Labor Management Relations Act — and, hence, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board. That issue turns on whether…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Local 100, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. BordenSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Local No. 207, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers Union v. PerkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hughes v. St. Louis National League Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Biggs v. LoidaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lane v. KattMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967