Legal Opinion

United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry v. Manson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1989No. 19623PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

NRCP 41(e) mandates dismissal of an action that has not been brought to trial within five years of the filing of the plaintiff’s complaint. In this case, the district court correctly held that the submission of a motion for summary judgment which is subsequently granted constitutes bringing an action to trial. The district court also correctly held that dismissal of a third-party claim becomes mandatory when the claim has not been brought to trial within five years of the time the original plaintiff commenced the action. The district court, however, erred in believing that NRCP 41(e)…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bradley v. RomeoNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Harris v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bella Vista Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. Toshi Van BlitterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Monroe v. Columbia Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Converse Professional Group v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Allyn v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API