Legal Opinion

San Joaquin Lumber Co. v. Welton

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1896No. Sac. No. 104PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

The action is to enforce an alleged lien on certain buildings for the value of materials, one hundred and eighty-six dollars and seventy-four cents, furnished by plaintiff to be used, and which were used, in the construction of said buildings.

The plaintiff had judgment by default, all the defendants having failed to appear. The defendants, H. J. and M. C. Sadler, have appealed from the judgment on the judgment-roll.

*3A reversal of the judgment is asked by appellant on the ground that no cause of action is stated in the complaint. The alleged defect in the complaint is that it does…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Schluter v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hendrix v. Gold Ridge Mines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Evans v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hollister v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API