Legal Opinion

Bedal v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

This is an action to quiet title to the use of certain water and for the reformation of a deed given by appellants to respondents. •

*798From the record it appears that appellants were the owners of two tracts of land known as the Basil and the Matli or Sandlin tracts. Highland Creek divides these two tracts of land. Prior to the sale of the Basil' land to respondents, in an action between Bedal and one, Alfred Percy, an owner of land above the tract owned by Bedal, a stipulated decree was entered wherein the waters of Highland Creek were decreed to Bedal and Percy as follows: The latter was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bafus v. PeeperIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Clifford v. LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fruitland State Bank v. LauerIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Woodland v. HodsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Caravelis v. CacavasIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Crumpacker v. Bank of Washington CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Chapman v. RivasIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Choate v. North Fork Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API