Legal Opinion

Woodland v. Hodson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, for Bingham County. Hon. F. J. Cowen, Judge. Action to quiet title to real property and enjoin removal of crops therefrom. Judgment for defendant.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, for Bingham County. Hon. F. J. Cowen, Judge. Action to quiet title to real property and enjoin removal of crops therefrom. Judgment for defendant. The question as to whether or not the parties in this case entered'into an agreement to abandon the boundary line between their lands established by Gray and Keeney was a question of fact for the jury, and the jury having found under the evidence that the plaintiff and defendant entered into such agreement, if there is substantial evidence to support such finding it will not be…

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a small tract of land and to enjoin the removal of crops therefrom by respondent.

From the record it appears that appellant is the owner of the NE. % of section 6, T. 3 S., R. 36 E., B. M., and that respondent is the owner of the NW. of said section; that said tracts were formerly owned by John Gray and Jacob Keeney, respectively, who in 1880, or thereabouts, established a-division line and jointly constructed a fence between these properties, according to which the lands were claimed and occupied not only by them but also by appellant and respondent after…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olson v. CaufieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Independence Placer Mining Co. v. KnaussIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Woodland v. HodsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bedal v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chapman v. RivasIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McMaster v. DunnIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API