Legal Opinion
Rho Company v. Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1989No. 55569-9Published
1Opinion of the Court
113 Wn.2d 561 (1989)
782 P.2d 986
RHO COMPANY, INC., Respondent,
v.
THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner.
No. 55569-9.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
October 31, 1989.
Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Mary E. Fairhurst, Assistant, for petitioner.
Joseph D. Holmes, Jr., and Philip A. Talmadge (of Karr, Tuttle, Campbell), for respondent.
DURHAM, J.
Rho Company, Inc. (Rho) contends that WAC 458-20-111 which excludes certain "pass through" payments from gross income for purposes of business and occupation taxes applies to its business, which supplied temporary engineering…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. ScurlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- City of Detroit v. Murray Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.