Legal Opinion

Workman v. Topa VI Equities Corporation

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided April 30, 2018No. 3:16-cv-00031Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN DEVAN WORKMAN and DARREN WORKMAN, Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 16-31 . OPINION TOPA VI EQUITIES CORPORATION, Defendant. THOMPSON, U.S.D.1.! INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 88.) Plaintiffs oppose. (ECF Nos. 112, 113.) The Court has decided the Motion based on the written submissions of the parties and without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b). For the reasons stated herein,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Thomas v. RIJOSDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2011
  5. Tutein v. ParrySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API