Legal Opinion
Boring v. Google, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 17, 2009No. Civil Action 08-694PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HAY, United States Magistrate Judge.
In April 2008, Pennsylvania residents, Aaron and Christine Boring (“the Plaintiffs” or “the Borings”), filed a five count Complaint against Google, Inc. (“the Defendant” or “Google”), a Delaware corporation, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The Borings alleged entitlement to compensatory and punitive damages based on four tort-based causes of action: (1) Count I— invasion of privacy; (2) Count II — trespass; (3) Count IV — negligence; and (5) Count V — conversion. In Count III, the Plaintiffs asserted a claim…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Boring v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- DIETRICH v. MOUNT OLIVER BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- M3 USA CORPORATION v. HARTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- PELLEGRINO v. EPIC GAMES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020