Martin v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellant was indicted for possessing a still and stillworm, and, upon his trial, was -convicted, and has appealed.
He assigns as error the -alleged insufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict. The testimony fully supports the summary of the evidence contained in the brief of the Attorney General, as follows: A stillworm and other parts of a still were found, covered in -some hay in a crib, on the farm where appellant -and his father lived. There was also found in the crib about twenty gallons of whiskey, which appellant admitted belonged to him, and for which he testified that he…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Logan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Little v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- McDaniel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.