Legal Opinion

Voss v. Quicken Loans LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 26, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00756Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SAMUEL VOSS, Case No. 1:20-cv-756 Plaintiff, Bowman, M.J. v. QUICKEN LOANS LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 Plaintiff Samuel Voss filed a putative class action suit against Defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”) and Quicken Loans, LLC (“Quicken”) in state court, alleging that Defendants failed to comply with state law when they did not file an entry of satisfaction of a mortgage on Plaintiff’s property within 90 days of the sale of that property. Defendants removed the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API