Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1985No. 8416SC429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendant first assigns error to the failure to dismiss the charge of manslaughter at the close of all the evidence. He argues, relying on State v. Markham, 5 N.C. App. 391, 168 S.E. 2d 449 (1969), that there was not sufficient evidence of manslaughter to be considered by the jury. In Markham there was evidence the defendant was intoxicated at the time of a fatal accident but little evidence as to the manner in which he was driving. This Court held it was error not to allow the defendant’s motion to dismiss made at the close of the evidence. In State v. McKenzie, 292 N.C. 170,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. McKenzieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McGillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API